September 30, 2003
THE CONCRETE QUAGMIRE:
U.S. mission remains on track in Iraq (MICHAEL O'HANLON, 10/01/03, The Japan Times)
[M]ost indicators are now favorable in Iraq. Consider first the security environment. We face three main challenges -- from criminals, Ba'athists and jihadists. On the first matter, while crime rates are too high, they have generally stabilized at levels statistically no higher than in many Western cities. As Iraqi police are increasingly recruited and trained, rates should decline -- though Iraq clearly also needs a judicial system as soon as possible to deal with those detained.As for Ba'athist remnants of Saddam Hussein's regime, they are diminishing with time as coalition forces detain and arrest them. For example, in the region north of Baghdad now run by Gen. Ray Odierno's 4th infantry division, some 600 fighters have been killed and 2,500 arrested over recent months. Not all of these are Ba'athists, to be sure, but with those kinds of attrition rates, a group of fighters that probably numbered 10,000 to 20,000 at peak strength will decline over time, especially because it has no appealing ideology with which to attract more members.
Terrorist "jihadists" are a greater worry because it cannot yet be confidently asserted that their numbers in Iraq have begun to decline or even plateau. In an overdue move, coalition forces have been strengthening border patrols to check the influx of foreign terrorists. They can hardly be expected to seal off all entry points into Iraq (though a few thousand more coalition troops might help, at least until more Iraqi border police can be trained, but even that would not solve it). But they can probably contain the problem. But their numbers do not appear enormous, and local intelligence networks that enable us to find and attack them are improving with time. [...]
Of course, economic issues are critical in any counterinsurgency as well. [...]
The problems are well known -- high unemployment, low electricity levels, worries about availability of gas supplies for the coming winter, even insufficient food in some places. But there is room for hope. Oil production is up. Coalition authorities are refurbishing power plants and building redundant electricity lines so that when main lines are sabotaged occasionally in the future, as they surely will be, power still flows. They are hiring Iraqis to man security forces, repair public infrastructure, beautify parks and buildings, and fix factories. If Congress does the right thing and approves President George W. Bush's full $87 billion supplemental request for next year, positive trends should accelerate.
Now what do the Democrats have left to talk about? Posted by Orrin Judd at September 30, 2003 11:35 PM
For an up-to-date analysis of coalition casualties, see:
http://www.samizdata.net/blog/archives/004670.html#004670
This seems to indicate that the guerilla phase peaked in July, and has been in slow decline since.
Posted by: jd watson at October 1, 2003 2:02 AMThe Dems don't need to talk about anything. Their friends in the media do all the talking. Clinton did basically nothing during his 8 years in office, but he was praised on a daily basis as the best president ever.
And the media will not stop talking about Bush's lies, about the absence of WMDs, about the jobless, the homeless and above all, about Valerie Plame. Wesley Clark (or maybe Howard Dean, depending on the primaries) has only one thing to do : shut up and prepare his inauguration address.
Posted by: Peter at October 1, 2003 3:20 AMPeter: What color is the sky in your world?
Posted by: Chris at October 1, 2003 9:24 AMI can't figure out if Peter there is anti-Democrat and their media supporters (para 1), or anti-Bush for the same blah blah blah we all know cold by now (para 2), or both, or what.
I would just point out that....
A) I'll take any bets that the "Plame affair" will NOT show up in any NYT or WaPo front page headline in the last half of November. i.e. it will be yet another stale yellowcake. (Hey, I like that. "Stale Yellowcake". Feel free to meme it.)
B) What Peter and those media people are missing, and I think Bush is not, is that they are seriously wrecking their credibility on a daily basis, relentlessy so. Do they think we are oblivious to the number of things they have predicted or even "reported", that just turned out to be totally not so? Jayson Blair, writ large? And for some reason, all those reports seem to reflect badly on the Bush Admin or conservatism in general when they are "hot, forgotten six weeks later. Purely a coincidence I am sure.
I think the major media is in fact getting it's Vietnam that it so badly wants. Problem is, it ain't a Bush or military quagmire. It's the profound cynicism on the part of the American people that results from events. Then, that cynicism was directed at the government and military. Now it's at the major media. I'm wondering how long it will take for said media to get THAT story. Maybe they will, say, mid-November next year.
Posted by: Andrew X at October 1, 2003 10:36 AMWhen Truman was elected (in 1948) after weeks of anticipation of a Dewey administration, the press put a large sign in Union Station to greet Truman's return: "Mr. President, we are ready to eat crow whenever you are ready to serve it". Somehow, I don't think we'll see that next November.
Posted by: jim hamlen at October 1, 2003 1:27 PM