October 05, 2003
FORGOTTEN FOUNDER:
Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God (Jonathan Edwards, Enfield, Connecticut, July 8, 1741)
[N]atural men are held in the hand of God, over the pit of hell; they have deserved the fiery pit, and are already sentenced to it; and God is dreadfully provoked, his anger is as great towards them as to those that are actually suffering the executions of the fierceness of his wrath in hell, and they have done nothing in the least to appease or abate that anger, neither is God in the least bound by any promise to hold them up one moment; the devil is waiting for them, hell is gaping for them, the flames gather and flash about them, and would fain lay hold on them, and swallow them up; the fire pent up in their own hearts is struggling to break out: and they have no interest in any Mediator, there are no means within reach that can be any security to them. In short, they have no refuge, nothing to take hold of; all that preserves them every moment is the mere arbitrary will, and uncovenanted, unobliged forbearance of an incensed God.Application
The use of this awful subject may be for awakening unconverted persons in this congregation. This that you have heard is the case of every one of you that are out of Christ. -- That world of misery, that take of burning brimstone, is extended abroad under you. There is the dreadful pit of the glowing flames of the wrath of God; there is hell's wide gaping mouth open; and you have nothing to stand upon, nor any thing to take hold of; there is nothing between you and hell but the air; it is only the power and mere pleasure of God that holds you up.
You probably are not sensible of this; you find you are kept out of hell, but do not see the hand of God in it; but look at other things, as the good state of your bodily constitution, your care of your own life, and the means you use for your own preservation. But indeed these things are nothing; if God should withdraw his hand, they would avail no more to keep you from falling, than the thin air to hold up a person that is suspended in it.
Your wickedness makes you as it were heavy as lead, and to tend downwards with great weight and pressure towards hell; and if God should let you go, you would immediately sink and swiftly descend and plunge into the bottomless gulf, and your healthy constitution, and your own care and prudence, and best contrivance, and all your righteousness, would have no more influence to uphold you and keep you out of hell, than a spider's web would have to stop a falling rock. Were it not for the sovereign pleasure of God, the earth would not bear you one moment; for you are a burden to it; the creation groans with you; the creature is made subject to the bondage of your corruption, not willingly; the sun does not willingly shine upon you to give you light to serve sin and Satan; the earth does not willingly yield her increase to satisfy your lusts; nor is it willingly a stage for your wickedness to be acted upon; the air does not willingly serve you for breath to maintain the flame of life in your vitals, while you spend your life in the service of God's enemies. God's creatures are good, and were made for men to serve God with, and do not willingly subserve to any other purpose, and groan when they are abused to purposes so directly contrary to their nature and end. And the world would spew you out, were it not for the sovereign hand of him who hath subjected it in hope. There are the black clouds of God's wrath now hanging directly over your heads, full of the dreadful storm, and big with thunder; and were it not for the restraining hand of God, it would immediately burst forth upon you. The sovereign pleasure of God, for the present, stays his rough wind; otherwise it would come with fury, and your destruction would come like a whirlwind, and you would be like the chaff of the summer threshing floor.
The wrath of God is like great waters that are dammed for the present; they increase more and more, and rise higher and higher, till an outlet is given; and the longer the stream is stopped, the more rapid and mighty is its course, when once it is let loose. It is true, that judgment against your evil works has not been executed hitherto; the floods of God's vengeance have been withheld; but your guilt in the mean time is constantly increasing, and you are every day treasuring up more wrath; the waters are constantly rising, and waxing more and more mighty; and there is nothing but the mere pleasure of God, that holds the waters back, that are unwilling to be stopped, and press hard to go forward. If God should only withdraw his hand from the flood-gate, it would immediately fly open, and the fiery floods of the fierceness and wrath of God, would rush forth with inconceivable fury, and would come upon you with omnipotent power; and if your strength were ten thousand times greater than it is, yea, ten thousand times greater than the strength of the stoutest, sturdiest devil in hell, it would be nothing to withstand or endure it.
The bow of God's wrath is bent, and the arrow made ready on the string, and justice bends the arrow at your heart, and strains the bow, and it is nothing but the mere pleasure of God, and that of an angry God, without any promise or obligation at all, that keeps the arrow one moment from being made drunk with your blood. Thus all you that never passed under a great change of heart, by the mighty power of the Spirit of God upon your souls; all you that were never bom again, and made new creatures, and raised from being dead in sin, to a state of new, and before altogether unexperienced light and life, are in the hands of an angry God. However you may have reformed your life in many things, and may have had religious affections, and may keep up a form of religion in your families and closets, and in the house of God, it is nothing but his mere pleasure that keeps you from being this moment swallowed up in everlasting destruction. However unconvinced you may now be of the truth of what you hear, by and by you will be fully convinced of it. Those that are gone from being in the like circumstances with you, see that it was so with them; for destruction came suddenly upon most of them; when they expected nothing of it, and while they were saying, Peace and safety: now they see, that those things on which they depended for peace and safety, were nothing but thin air and empty shadows.
The God that holds you over the pit of hell, much as one holds a spider, or some loathsome insect over the fire, abhors you, and is dreadfully provoked: his wrath towards you burns like fire; he looks upon you as worthy of nothing else, but to be cast into the fire; he is of purer eyes than to bear to have you in his sight; you are ten thousand times more abominable in his eyes, than the most hateful venomous serpent is in ours. You have offended him infinitely more than ever a stubborn rebel did his prince; and yet it is nothing but his hand that holds you from falling into the fire every moment. It is to be ascribed to nothing else, that you did not go to hell the last night; that you was suffered to awake again in this world, after you closed your eyes to sleep. And there is no other reason to be given, why you have not dropped into hell since you arose in the morning, but that God's hand has held you up. There is no other reason to be given why you have not gone to hell, since you have sat here in the house of God, provoking his pure eyes by your sinful wicked manner of attending his solemn worship. Yea, there is nothing else that is to be given as a reason why you do not this very moment drop down into hell.
O sinner! Consider the fearful danger you are in: it is a great fumace of wrath, a wide and bottomless pit, full of the fire of wrath, that you are held over in the hand of that God, whose wrath is provoked and incensed as much against you, as against many of the damned in hell. You hang by a slender thread, with the flames of divine wrath flashing about it, and ready every moment to singe it, and burn it asunder; and you have no interest in any Mediator, and nothing to lay hold of to save yourself, nothing to keep off the flames of wrath, nothing of your own, nothing that you ever have done, nothing that you can do, to induce God to spare you one moment.
Most of us had to read this sermon in grade school or college--presumably because it's in the Norton Anthology?--and found it quite terrifying, maybe even deranged. But, what most English professors fails to teach, because they don't likely comprehend it, is that this view of human nature is vital to our constitutional regime. Just as Edwards preaches that we are inherently wicked and incapable of binding God by any action of our own, no matter how rigidly we think we conform to His desires, so too the Founders proceeded from a profoundly pessimistic view of human nature and the assumption that no man was to be simply trusted to benignly wield power over another, Federalist No. 51: The Structure of the Government Must Furnish the Proper Checks and Balances Between the Different Departments (From the New York Packet, Friday, February 8, 1788, Author: Alexander Hamilton or James Madison):
To the People of the State of New York:TO WHAT expedient, then, shall we finally resort, for maintaining in practice the necessary partition of power among the several departments, as laid down in the Constitution? The only answer that can be given is, that as all these exterior provisions are found to be inadequate, the defect must be supplied, by so contriving the interior structure of the government as that its several constituent parts may, by their mutual relations, be the means of keeping each other in their proper places. Without presuming to undertake a full development of this important idea, I will hazard a few general observations, which may perhaps place it in a clearer light, and enable us to form a more correct judgment of the principles and structure of the government planned by the convention. In order to lay a due foundation for that separate and distinct exercise of the different powers of government, which to a certain extent is admitted on all hands to be essential to the preservation of liberty, it is evident that each department should have a will of its own; and consequently should be so constituted that the members of each should have as little agency as possible in the appointment of the members of the others. Were this principle rigorously adhered to, it would require that all the appointments for the supreme executive, legislative, and judiciary magistracies should be drawn from the same fountain of authority, the people, through channels having no communication whatever with one another. Perhaps such a plan of constructing the several departments would be less difficult in practice than it may in contemplation appear. Some difficulties, however, and some additional expense would attend the execution of it. Some deviations, therefore, from the principle must be admitted. In the constitution of the judiciary department in particular, it might be inexpedient to insist rigorously on the principle: first, because peculiar qualifications being essential in the members, the primary consideration ought to be to select that mode of choice which best secures these qualifications; secondly, because the permanent tenure by which the appointments are held in that department, must soon destroy all sense of dependence on the authority conferring them. It is equally evident, that the members of each department should be as little dependent as possible on those of the others, for the emoluments annexed to their offices. Were the executive magistrate, or the judges, not independent of the legislature in this particular, their independence in every other would be merely nominal. But the great security against a gradual concentration of the several powers in the same department, consists in giving to those who administer each department the necessary constitutional means and personal motives to resist encroachments of the others. The provision for defense must in this, as in all other cases, be made commensurate to the danger of attack. Ambition must be made to counteract ambition. The interest of the man must be connected with the constitutional rights of the place. It may be a reflection on human nature, that such devices should be necessary to control the abuses of government. But what is government itself, but the greatest of all reflections on human nature? If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary. In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this: you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself. A dependence on the people is, no doubt, the primary control on the government; but experience has taught mankind the necessity of auxiliary precautions. This policy of supplying, by opposite and rival interests, the defect of better motives, might be traced through the whole system of human affairs, private as well as public. We see it particularly displayed in all the subordinate distributions of power, where the constant aim is to divide and arrange the several offices in such a manner as that each may be a check on the other that the private interest of every individual may be a sentinel over the public rights. These inventions of prudence cannot be less requisite in the distribution of the supreme powers of the State.
But, obviously Edwards didn't just stand there and tell folks they were doomeded. There has to be some hope for mankind or what's the point. And for Edwards, the point was that through the grace of God--via His Son--some might enter a kingdom of love:
How dreadful is the state of those that are daily and hourly in the danger of this great wrath and infinite misery! But this is the dismal case of every soul in this congregation that has not been bom again, however moral and strict, sober and religious, they may otherwise be. Oh that you would consider it, whether you be young or old! There is reason to think, that there are many in this congregation now hearing this discourse, that will actually be the subjects of this very misery to all eternity. We know not who they are, or in what seats they sit, or what thoughts they now have. It may be they are now at ease, and hear all these things without much disturbance, and are now flattering themselves that they are not the persons, promising themselves that they shall escape. If we knew that there was one person, and but one, in the whole congregation, that was to be the subject of this misery, what an awful thing would it be to think of! If we knew who it was, what an awful sight would it be to see such a person! How might all the rest of the congregation lift up a lamentable and bitter cry over him! But, alas! instead of one, how many is it likely will remember this discourse in hell? And it would be a wonder, if some that are now present should not be in hell in a very short time, even before this year is out. And it would be no wonder if some persons, that now sit here, in some seats of this meeting-house, in health, quiet and secure, should be there before tomorrow morning. Those of you that finally continue in a natural condition, that shall keep out of hell longest will be there in a little time! your damnation does not slumber; it will come swiftly, and, in all probability, very suddenly upon many of you. You have reason to wonder that you are not already in hell. It is doubtless the case of some whom you have seen and known, that never deserved hell more than you, and that heretofore appeared as likely to have been now alive as you. Their case is past all hope; they are crying in extreme misery and perfect despair; but here you are in the land of the living and in the house of God, and have an opportunity to obtain salvation. What would not those poor damned hopeless souls give for one day's opportunity such as you now enjoy!And now you have an extraordinary opportunity, a day wherein Christ has thrown the door of mercy wide open, and stands in calling and crying with a loud voice to poor sinners; a day wherein many are flocking to him, and pressing into the kingdom of God. Many are daily coming from the east, west, north and south; many that were very lately in the same miserable condition that you are in, are now in a happy state, with their hearts filled with love to him who has loved them, and washed them from their sins in his own blood, and rejoicing in hope of the glory of God. How awful is it to be left behind at such a day! To see so many others feasting, while you are pining and perishing! To see so many rejoicing and singing for joy of heart, while you have cause to mourn for sorrow of heart, and howl for vexation of spirit! How can you rest one moment in such a condition?
The Federalists were not, of course, concerned with the hereafter, but they too had to hold out hope, else self-government would have been deemed impossible:
Federalist No. 55: The Total Number of the House of Representatives )From the New York Packet, Friday, February 15, 1788, Author: Alexander Hamilton or James Madison)
To the People of the State of New York:[...]
The truth is, that in all cases a certain number at least seems to be necessary to secure the benefits of free consultation and discussion, and to guard against too easy a combination for improper purposes; as, on the other hand, the number ought at most to be kept within a certain limit, in order to avoid the confusion and intemperance of a multitude. In all very numerous assemblies, of whatever character composed, passion never fails to wrest the sceptre from reason.
Had every Athenian citizen been a Socrates, every Athenian assembly would still have been a mob. [...]
But judging from the circumstances now before us, and from the probable state of them within a moderate period of time, I must pronounce that the liberties of America cannot be unsafe in the number of hands proposed by the federal Constitution. From what quarter can the danger proceed? Are we afraid of foreign gold? If foreign gold could so easily corrupt our federal rulers and enable them to ensnare and betray their constituents, how has it happened that we are at this time a free and independent nation? The Congress which conducted us through the Revolution was a less numerous body than their successors will be; they were not chosen by, nor responsible to, their fellow citizens at large; though appointed from year to year, and recallable at pleasure, they were generally continued for three years, and prior to the ratification of the federal articles, for a still longer term.
They held their consultations always under the veil of secrecy; they had the sole transaction of our affairs with foreign nations; through the whole course of the war they had the fate of their country more in their hands than it is to be hoped will ever be the case with our future representatives; and from the greatness of the prize at stake, and the eagerness of the party which lost it, it may well be supposed that the use of other means than force would not have been scrupled. Yet we know by happy experience that the public trust was not betrayed; nor has the purity of our public councils in this particular ever suffered, even from the whispers of calumny. Is the danger apprehended from the other branches of the federal government?
But where are the means to be found by the President, or the Senate, or both? Their emoluments of office, it is to be presumed, will not, and without a previous corruption of the House of Representatives cannot, more than suffice for very different purposes; their private fortunes, as they must all be American citizens, cannot possibly be sources of danger. The only means, then, which they can possess, will be in the dispensation of appointments. Is it here that suspicion rests her charge? Sometimes we are told that this fund of corruption is to be exhausted by the President in subduing the virtue of the Senate. Now, the fidelity of the other House is to be the victim. The improbability of such a mercenary and perfidious combination of the several members of government, standing on as different foundations as republican principles will well admit, and at the same time accountable to the society over which they are placed, ought alone to quiet this apprehension. But, fortunately, the Constitution has provided a still further safeguard. The members of the Congress are rendered ineligible to any civil offices that may be created, or of which the emoluments may be increased, during the term of their election.
No offices therefore can be dealt out to the existing members but such as may become vacant by ordinary casualties: and to suppose that these would be sufficient to purchase the guardians of the people, selected by the people themselves, is to renounce every rule by which events ought to be calculated, and to substitute an indiscriminate and unbounded jealousy, with which all reasoning must be vain. The sincere friends of liberty, who give themselves up to the extravagancies of this passion, are not aware of the injury they do their own cause. As there is a degree of depravity in mankind which requires a certain degree of circumspection and distrust, so there are other qualities in human nature which justify a certain portion of esteem and confidence. Republican government presupposes the existence of these qualities in a higher degree than any other form. Were the pictures which have been drawn by the political jealousy of some among us faithful likenesses of the human character, the inference would be, that there is not sufficient virtue among men for self-government; and that nothing less than the chains of despotism can restrain them from destroying and devouring one another.
The rationalists among us may well disdain Jonathan Edwards and the forbidding God he preached, but the question for us today is would the American Republic have succeeded had it not been grounded in his vision? and will it endure if we lose sight of that vision? Posted by Orrin Judd at October 5, 2003 11:22 AM
You really need to figure out a way to get paid for this stuff.
Posted by: David Cohen at October 5, 2003 04:10 PMSimple observation suffices nicely, actually, to determine the manifold shortcomings of human nature.
Throwing a Hairy Thunderer into the mix doesn't change reality on the ground in the least.
Posted by: Jeff Guinn at October 5, 2003 08:46 PMNever fear, Jeff, one of these days an atheist state will actually work and we'll all forget about the: Nazis, Communists, etc.
Posted by: oj at October 5, 2003 08:54 PMThis reminds me of Karl Malden in Polyanna. He played the fire and brimestone preacher who depressed and upset everyone with his "Death comes unexpectedly!!" sermons. This was Disney, so of course smiling Hailey Mills got to him and turned him into a sugary Jeff Guinn. Wimp!
Long live the Old Testament!
Posted by: Peter B at October 5, 2003 09:35 PMWonder if it will take as long as the couple hundred years of secularism has taken to cause people to forget the viciousness of sectarianism.
Posted by: Jeff Guinn at October 6, 2003 07:08 AMWho's forgotten? I jjust happen to approve of sectarian violence perpetrated by Christianity and disapprove of statist violence. Ideas matter.
Posted by: oj at October 6, 2003 08:37 AMThe couple of hundred years of secularism has been a golden age. The French Revolution, Napolean, 1848, Darwin, Freud, Marx, WW I, The Bolsheviks, National Socialism,The Cold War, Mao, Pol Pot....
Let the good times roll!
Posted by: Tom C., Stamford,Ct. at October 6, 2003 09:36 AMRe the Hairy Thunderer: Edwards was actually a mild-mannered man who read his sermons quietly from the pulpit. He would not have done well in Speech Comm. 101. But people in the congregation fainted when they heard his message.
Posted by: jim hamlen at October 6, 2003 12:43 PMTom:
Have you forgotten already? They were all monarchical and therefore spitting images of religion--nothing to do with secularism whatsoever. The fact that they opposed, mocked, disdained and murdered believers was because they were confused--peas in a pod, actually.
Posted by: Peter B at October 6, 2003 03:54 PMTom:
So all those things let sectarian slaughter off the hook, huh?
Peter:
They were all absolutist, baroque, monarchic belief systems. Or, in other terms, universalist, salvationist, and monotheistic (in case you don't think Communism has deities, you haven't heard of Mao, Marx, or Dear Leader).
So what you need to watch out for is anyone claiming absolute truth for everyone.
Whether the deity is supernatural or not makes no difference to the tendency towards slaughter.
Jim:
By Hairy Thunderer I was referring to one variant of God. Some religions tend more towards Cosmic Muffin. Who's to know?
Posted by: Jeff Guinn at October 6, 2003 09:11 PMWe just admire Darwin, we don'tg worship him.
This is the anniversary of the strangling of Wyclife.
Posted by: Harry Eagar at October 6, 2003 11:19 PMAccepting someone's word on faith alone is religious.
Posted by: oj at October 6, 2003 11:22 PMJeff-
I'm not the guy trying to let anyone off the hook. Why are you?
Posted by: Tom C., Stamford,Ct. at October 6, 2003 11:48 PMGive me something positive, constructive coming out of the above mentioned historical/secularist episodes, then we'll talk.
Posted by: Tom C., Stamford,Ct. at October 7, 2003 12:24 AMOf the leading secular figures referred to, it is interesting that Nietzsche and Stalin started out as theology students. I have heard the same about Pol Pot, but don't know if it is true.
Posted by: jim hamlen at October 7, 2003 10:40 AMTom:
Because every time someone brings up rationalist doubt, the first thing to come trotting out--absent any irony--is the horrors of the -isms.
As if they make the victims of sectarian slaughter any less dead.
And, as if the underlying cause of them all isn't universalist, salvationist, monotheism.
Posted by: Jeff Guinn at October 7, 2003 01:58 PMGranted, accepting someone's theories is an exercise in faith. Athough some forms of faith can rely on more material substantiation than others.
But it takes more than that to have a religion.
As soon as Evolutionists start espousing death to evolutionary heretics, then we'll talk.
Posted by: Jeff Guinn at October 7, 2003 02:02 PMNazism was just Darwinism applied.
Posted by: oj at October 7, 2003 02:12 PMJeff-
If only the rationalists had doubted just a bit more.
Posted by: Tom C., Stamford,Ct. at October 7, 2003 03:03 PMSo why aren't all Darwinists nazis?
Posted by: Harry Eagar at October 7, 2003 03:41 PMThe same reason all Christians aren't. Any idea can be used for a bad purpose.
Posted by: oj at October 7, 2003 04:29 PMApplied Darwinism is an oxymoron.
Tom:
Because they weren't rationalists. The absence of a deity in a belief system by no means makes it rational.
Posted by: Jeff Guinn at October 7, 2003 10:01 PMJeff-
As far as I can tell the only thing rationalists consistently doubt is the spiritual view. They are more apt to believe in the science of elite socist planning and engineering than not. The intellectual/rationalist has been the socialist/statist as well. Those who generally take a more historically inclined and thus realistic view of human nature, which, by the way, comports with the western, religiously inspired view have, more or less, been immune.
Posted by: Tom C., Stamford,Ct. at October 8, 2003 02:21 PMTom:
Plenty of religious people have been socialist/statist. There is nothing about religion the prevents one concluding that unjust social structures lead to immoral social outcomes.
Heck, I wouldn't be surprised if Jesus said things to that effect.
Rationalists have problems with the spiritual view because there are so many conflicting ones, and there is no way to distinguish which, if any, among them, is correct. There are other problems too, chief among them the pronounced tendency for holders of the spiritual view to assert they possess absolute truth.
Posted by: Jeff Guinn at October 8, 2003 11:28 PMThe problem is that all secularists are statists, necessarily replacing moral boundaries with legal ones.
Posted by: oj at October 8, 2003 11:31 PMA tragedy, I'm sure, that the state refuses to murder its citizens for insufficient credulity.
Posted by: Harry Eagar at October 9, 2003 01:26 AMThat's precisely what States do. What do you think the Gulag was?
Posted by: oj at October 9, 2003 08:16 AMoj-
Yeah, but the Czar was worse.
Posted by: Tom C., Stamford,Ct. at October 9, 2003 09:36 AMI'll bet that, as a proportion, no more secularists are statists than are religionists.
The number of secularists who are statists is far less than all, and the number of religionists far more than none.
Which makes the correlation between religious belief and statism close to zero.
Posted by: Jeff Guinn at October 9, 2003 10:08 AMTo the contrary, to not believe in God and morality is to require law and the State to govern behavior. This statism, as witness every secular/atheist ism we've seen in the West.
Posted by: oj at October 9, 2003 10:13 AM